<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 0.99999&#8230; = 1, exactly</title>
	<link>http://www.philhord.com/phord/099999-1-exactly/</link>
	<description>Hobbies, family, life, science</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.philhord.com/phord/099999-1-exactly/#comment-5600</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.philhord.com/phord/099999-1-exactly/#comment-5600</guid>
					<description>The nicest way I've always had of thinking about this is as follows :

1/9 = 0.11111111111111111111 etc
2/9 = 0.22222222222222222222 etc

etc

so,

9/9 = 0.99999999999999999999 etc

But 9/9 is also of course equal to 1!

QED ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nicest way I&#8217;ve always had of thinking about this is as follows :</p>
<p>1/9 = 0.11111111111111111111 etc<br />
2/9 = 0.22222222222222222222 etc</p>
<p>etc</p>
<p>so,</p>
<p>9/9 = 0.99999999999999999999 etc</p>
<p>But 9/9 is also of course equal to 1!</p>
<p>QED <img src='http://www.philhord.com/phord/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: phord</title>
		<link>http://www.philhord.com/phord/099999-1-exactly/#comment-1751</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.philhord.com/phord/099999-1-exactly/#comment-1751</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;*** Spoiler Below ***&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;*** Spoiler Below ***&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;*** Spoiler Below ***&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;*** Spoiler Below ***&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;*** Spoiler Below ***&lt;/strong&gt;

Stop reading here if you don't want to see the answer given away.

The next two numbers are 857142, 999999.

142857 + 142857 = 285714
285714 + 142857 = 428571
428571 + 142857 = 571428
571428 + 142857 = 714285
714285 + 142857 = 857142
857142 + 142857 = 999999

It turns out there's an infinite number of series like this.  I found this one by looking at sevenths.  1/7 = 0.142857(142857).  7/7 = 0.999999(999999), or 1.0.  This sequence (repeating decimal) occurs for many fractions where the denominator is a prime number.  I happened upon this tidbit over at &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/"&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repeating_decimal#Fractions_with_prime_denominators"&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>*** Spoiler Below ***</strong></p>
<p><strong>*** Spoiler Below ***</strong></p>
<p><strong>*** Spoiler Below ***</strong></p>
<p><strong>*** Spoiler Below ***</strong></p>
<p><strong>*** Spoiler Below ***</strong></p>
<p>Stop reading here if you don&#8217;t want to see the answer given away.</p>
<p>The next two numbers are 857142, 999999.</p>
<p>142857 + 142857 = 285714<br />
285714 + 142857 = 428571<br />
428571 + 142857 = 571428<br />
571428 + 142857 = 714285<br />
714285 + 142857 = 857142<br />
857142 + 142857 = 999999</p>
<p>It turns out there&#8217;s an infinite number of series like this.  I found this one by looking at sevenths.  1/7 = 0.142857(142857).  7/7 = 0.999999(999999), or 1.0.  This sequence (repeating decimal) occurs for many fractions where the denominator is a prime number.  I happened upon this tidbit over at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a> on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repeating_decimal#Fractions_with_prime_denominators">this page</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: linde</title>
		<link>http://www.philhord.com/phord/099999-1-exactly/#comment-1735</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 06:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.philhord.com/phord/099999-1-exactly/#comment-1735</guid>
					<description>the next one should be 857142 but i dont see that there is one after that unless it goes back to 142857. but i was an english major and am not much of a math whiz.

btw, thanks for the headstart on the gdata api. i was comtemplating doing just what you did (and came across this blog because i was hoping to avoid it). if i end up extending it, i will post/contribute my work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the next one should be 857142 but i dont see that there is one after that unless it goes back to 142857. but i was an english major and am not much of a math whiz.</p>
<p>btw, thanks for the headstart on the gdata api. i was comtemplating doing just what you did (and came across this blog because i was hoping to avoid it). if i end up extending it, i will post/contribute my work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
